Read to the end.
Why I Should Carry a Gun?
This just about says it all.
Now I wont have to explain my guns
and the use of them...
PEOPLE ASK WHY?
Why I Carry a Gun.
My old grandpa said to me, Son,'
there comes a time in
every man's life when he stops bustin' knuckles
and starts bustin' caps and usually it's when
he becomes too old to take an ass whoopin'.
I don't carry a gun to kill people.
I carry a gun to keep from being killed.
I carry a gun because
sometimes this world can be
a scary place.
I don't carry a gun because
I'm paranoid.
I carry a gun because
there are real threats in the world.
I don't carry a gun because I'm evil.
I carry a gun because
I have lived long enough to
see the evil in the world.
I don't carry a gun because
I hate the government.
I carry a gun because
I understand the
limitations of government.
I don't carry a gun because
I'm angry.
I carry a gun so that
I don't have to spend the rest of my life
hating myself for failing to be prepared.
I don't carry a gun because
I want to shoot someone.
I carry a gun because
I want to die at a
ripe old age in my bed,
and not on a sidewalk somewhere
tomorrow afternoon.
I don't carry a gun because
I'm a cowboy.
I carry a gun because, when
I die and go to heaven,
I want to be a cowboy.
I don't carry a gun to make me
feel like a man.
I carry a gun because
men know how to
take care of themselves
and the ones they love.
I don't carry a gun because
I feel inadequate.
I carry a gun because
unarmed and facing three armed thugs,
I am inadequate.
I don't carry a gun because
I love it.
I carry a gun because
I love life
and the people who make it
meaningful to me.
Police Protection is an oxymoron.
Free citizens must protect themselves.
Police do not protect you from crime,
they usually just investigate the crime
after it happens
and then
call someone in to clean up the mess.
Personally,
I carry a gun because
I'm too young to die
and or too old to
take an ass whoopin'.
....author unknown
(but obviously brilliant)
|
In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control. From 1929 to 1953, about 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
From 1915 to 1917, 1.5 million Armenians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
A total of 13 million Jews and others who were unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated. China established gun control in 1935. From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated
From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayan Indians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated. Cambodia established gun control in 1956. From 1975 to 1977, one million educated people, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
to be destroyed by their own Government, a program costing Australia taxpayers more than $500 million dollars. The first year results were as follows List of 7 items: Note that while the law-abiding citizens turned them in, the criminals did not, and criminals still possess their guns! this has changed drastically upward in those 12 months, since criminals are guaranteed that their prey is unarmed. Australian politicians are at a loss to explain how public safety has decreased, after such monumental effort, and expense was expended in successfully ridding Australian society of guns. The Australian experience and the other historical facts above prove it. |
You won't see this data on the
US evening news,
or hear politicians
disseminating this information.
Guns in the hands of honest citizens
save lives and property and,
yes,
gun control laws adversely affect
only the law-abiding citizens.
Take note my fellow Americans,
before it's too late!
The next time someone
talks in favor of gun control,
please remind them of this history lesson.
With guns,
we are 'citizens'.
Without them,
we are 'subjects'.
(click image if you can't see it)
Yeah.
That's her.
(click image if you can't read it)
During WWII
the Japanese decided not to invade America
because they knew
most Americans were
ARMED!
(click image if you can't read it)
If you value your freedom,
please spread this
anti-gun control message
to all of your friends.
As the Supreme Court heard arguments
for and against the Chicago, IL Gun Ban,
this man offered you another stellar example of a letter
(written by a Marine),
that places the proper perspective on what a gun
means to a civilized society.
Interesting take
and one you don't hear much. . . . . .
Read this eloquent and profound letter
and pay close attention to the
last paragraph of the letter....
"The Gun Is Civilization"
by Maj. L. Caudill USMC (Ret)
Human beings
only have two ways to deal with one another:
reason and force.
If you want me to
do something for you,
you have a choice of
either convincing me via argument,
or force me to do your bidding
under threat of force.
Every human interaction
falls into one of those two categories,
without exception.
Reason or force,
that's it.
In a truly moral and civilized society,
people exclusively
interact through persuasion.
Force has no place as a
valid method of social interaction
and the only thing that
removes force from the menu
is the personal firearm,
as paradoxical as it may sound to some.
When I carry a gun,
you cannot deal with me by force.
You have to use
reason and try to persuade me,
because I have a way to
negate your threat
of employment of force.
The gun is the only
personal weapon that puts a
100-pound woman on equal footing
with a 220-pound mugger,
a 75-year old retiree
on equal footing
with a 19-year old gang banger,
and a single guy
on equal footing
with a carload of drunken guys
with baseball bats.
The gun removes
the disparity in physical strength,
size, or numbers
between a potential attacker
and a defender.
There are plenty of people who
consider the gun as the source
of bad force equations.
These are the people
who think that
we'd be more civilized
if all guns were removed from society,
because a firearm
makes it easier for a
[armed] mugger
to do his job.
That, of course,
is only true if the mugger's
potential victims are mostly
disarmed
either by choice
or by legislative fiat--
it has no validity when
most of a mugger's potential marks
are armed.
People who argue for the banning of arms
ask for automatic rule by the young,
the strong,
and the many,
and that's the exact opposite of a
civilized society.
A mugger, even an armed one,
can only make a successful living
in a society where
the state has granted him
a force monopoly.
Then there's the argument that the gun
makes confrontations lethal
that otherwise would only result in injury.
This argument is fallacious in several ways.
Without guns involved,
confrontations are won by the
physically superior party inflicting
overwhelming injury on the loser.
People who think that fists,
bats, sticks, or stones
don't constitute lethal force,
watch too much TV,
where people take beatings
and come out of it with a
bloody lip at worst.
The fact that the gun makes lethal force easier
works solely in favor of the weaker defender,
not the stronger attacker.
If both are armed,
the field is level.
The gun is the only weapon that's
as lethal in the hands of an octogenarian
as it is in the hands of a weight lifter.
It simply wouldn't work as well
as a force equalizer
if it wasn't both lethal
and easily employable.
When I carry a gun,
I don't do so because
I am looking for a fight,
but because
I'm looking to be left alone.
The gun at my side means that
I cannot be forced, only persuaded.
I don't carry it because I'm afraid,
but because it enables me to be unafraid.
It doesn't limit the actions of those who would
interact with me through reason,
only the actions of those who would
do so by force.
It removes force from the equation...
and that's why carrying a gun is a civilized act.
By Maj. L. Caudill USMC (Ret.)
After WWII,
a photo was found in an album
owned by a German Soldier.
On the back of the picture was written the words
"The Last Jew of Vinnytsia".....
At one point
there were over
28,000 Jews in and around
Vinnytsia, in the Ukraine.
And then,
one day,
there was only one.
Look at his face in the picture above.
Do you think for one second that
5 years before that picture was taken
he thought this was how
things would play out?
What about just a year before?
I would imagine
that if you could
go back in time
to a point
several years
before the slaughter
and tell him he should
actively arm himself against
the possibility that he,
along with most of his friends
and family,
would be
shot in the head
and dumped in a ditch
by the government.....
his arguments against doing so
would be eerily similar to that of
modern day
gun control advocates.
He would have thought you
were an extremist wacko.
Wikipedia is false Nazi propaganda bullshit. Nazis did NOT LOSE WW2.
I am banned from Wikipedia for correcting their false fake Nazi created definitions of shit.
The purpose of fighting is to win.
There is no possible victory in defense.
The sword is
more important than the shield,
and skill is
more important than either.
The final weapon is the brain.
All else is supplemental.
SWITZERLAND ISSUES
EVERY HOUSEHOLD
A GUN!
SWITZERLAND 'S GOVERNMENT
TRAINS
EVERY ADULT
THEY ISSUE A RIFLE TO.
SWITZERLAND
HAS THE LOWEST
GUN RELATED CRIME RATE
OF ANY
CIVILIZED COUNTRY
IN THE WORLD!!!
IT'S A NO BRAINER!
DON'T LET
OUR GOVERNMENT
WASTE MILLIONS
OF OUR
TAX DOLLARS
IN AN EFFORT
TO MAKE
ALL LAW ABIDING CITIZENS
AN EASY TARGET.
(Click Image Above If You Can/t Read It)
I'm a firm believer in the 2nd Amendment!
If you are too,
please feel 'free'
to forward.
Another webpage by
Ken
One thing I'd like to say.
Make sure you have a
GOOD SAFE
Doesn't hurt to
BE SAFE
Right?
From an email I got from my dad back in the 90's
Be safe, use a safe, Shoot safe, check your area,
know your area, use your wisdom.
Protect Yourself
Protect Your Family
Protect Your Country
Be Safe
